Stroke rehabilitation: Human therapists vs Robots
Two groups of stroke survivors. One group had robotic devices to assist them in walking again. The other group had physical therapists in attendance. Which group do you think performed better?
According to a study conducted by the University of Illinois in Chicago, stroke survivors seem to benefit more from therapist-assisted walking rehabilitation compared to those who underwent robotic devices-assisted therapy.
Although both groups showed progress in walking, the improvement is significantly higher among patients of the therapy-assisted group. Specifically, better improvements were observed in the speed of walking and the length of time spent using the weaker limb. The patients also felt a significant improvement in their over all quality of life.
So why the difference?
The researchers attributed it to the fact that
Stroke patients were also observed to work harder and exert more effort when training with physical therapists because the latter only help them when necessary.
According to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), successful rehabilitation of stroke victims depends on:
- Amount of damage to the brain
- Skill on the part of the rehabilitation team
- Cooperation of family and friends. Caring family/friends can be one of the most important factors in rehabilitation
- Timing of rehabilitation - the earlier it begins the more likely survivors are to regain lost abilities and skills
The main goal of rehabilitation is for the stroke survivor to achieve the highest possible level of independence and restore as much productivity as possible. Each patient is unique with unique rehabilitation needs. Human therapists are therefore better equipped in customizing a therapy or a training program to the patient’s condition and need. In the end, no piece of equipment, no matter how sophisticated, can be substitute for the human touch.
The researchers conclude that
Sources:
Hornby et al. Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- Versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects With Chronic Stroke. A Randomized Controlled Study. Stroke, 8 May 2008


Raquel Billiones has a PhD in Biology and has over 15 years experience as a researcher, scientific English teacher, and medical writer. Since 2006, she has been a freelance WAHM specializing in medical writing and scientific documentation. 
I think I would have chosen the human therapist as the victor in the challenge .. for the motivation they provide as they assist. Although, I wonder if some cost effectiveness could be maintained with some robotic assistance, and for longer periods?
Comment by HART (1-800-HART) on May 22, 2008 9:36 am
Good question! Unfortunately the present study didn’t look at cost effectiveness.
Generally though, in any kinds of work, robots tend to be cheaper than human workers. But in the end, human capital is very valuable and worth the money.
Comment by Raquel Billiones on May 23, 2008 4:04 am